Global
Civil liberties, privacy and democratic institutions
The Canadian privacy regulator's Google application has a defined procedural and technical scope. Removing a result from a name search is different from removing the underlying article.
A September meeting brought Canadian privacy and information oversight bodies together. Its shared agenda is not evidence that their jurisdictions or complaint processes have merged.
ICO records distinguish enforcing a service's minimum age from protecting younger users who are admitted. Default settings and subsequent data use require their own evidence.
New Canadian guidance addresses vendor assessment before a service is adopted. A completed questionnaire and responsibility for the resulting data use are not the same thing.
The OPC's August submission on Canada's Privacy Act addresses both high-risk assessments and transparency. An internal assessment and an explanation available to an affected person perform different jobs.
Canadian consultation comments distinguish confirming a customer's identity from defining the information a customer permits a service to use. The two controls cannot be read as substitutes.
The regulator has scheduled its transition to the Information Commission for September 30. Its announcement distinguishes governance changes from continuing regulatory functions.
The ICO's final storage and access guidance covers several technologies and purposes. A dated claim about banners cannot establish every site's wider handling of information.
A September ICO commentary connects wearable technology with accessibility. A recording indicator that exists and an explanation someone can perceive are different design questions.
The European Data Protection Board's September announcement concerns when a fine is appropriate. Its existing calculation guidance addresses another stage, and the two publication statuses differ.
Council of Europe experts are developing a recommendation for the digital environment. Counting available outlets and examining what audiences encounter are separate measurement questions.
Canada's privacy regulator is investigating IDScan.net. Its announcement raises two different evidentiary questions: how information was protected and what affected people were told.
